In The National Law Review, CFJ's Ashley Baker argues that reining in dominant proxy advisory firms protects shareholders' property rights.

American technological leadership results from secure property rights driving risk taking not from centralized planning or regulatory micromanagement.

In The Washington Times, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that the STB should approve the Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger based on dynamic competition, not size.

These proposed reforms—particularly the restrictions on serial and parallel inter partes review (“IPR”) challenges and the requirement that petitioners stipulate to litigating validity in only one forum—represent an urgently needed course-correction to restore reliability to U.S. patent rights, strengthen American innovation, and fortify the nation’s technological leadership against foreign adversaries, especially the People’s Republic of China.

State attempts to regulate artificial intelligence violate the Commerce Clause and risk crippling U.S. innovation. Congress must pass a federal moratorium to preempt state fragmentation and promote AI development.

In RealClearMarkets, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that the EU's Digital Markets Act punishes scale and success and stifles the innovation Europe says it wants.

In Truth on the Market, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that NIH's “access plan” mandate for patent licenses is central planning that threatens biomedical innovation.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the lower court injunction violates longstanding antitrust precedent, will result in irreparable harm and is against the public interest.

In National Review, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that a fee on patent value would be an unconstitutional, unapportioned property tax that discourages innovation.