In The National Law Review, CFJ's Ashley Baker argues that the Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger would strengthen competition by helping rail take on trucking.

In National Review, CFJ's Ashley Baker argues that Trump should use Section 301 to fight Europe's discriminatory digital taxes and rules targeting U.S. tech firms.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the opinion represents a fundamental break from Supreme Court precedent.

The ruling represents an extreme departure from settled antitrust law. The injunction does not merely prohibit unlawful conduct—it compels Google to open the Play Store it built through years of investment to competitors for free, to distribute its entire app catalog to rival stores, and even to carry those rival stores within its own platform.

The Committee for Justice applauds the committee for allocating $37 million below the 2025 FTC appropriations level.

CFJ applauds 6-3 decision in US v. Skrmetti, upholding TN law that bans puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender teens.

In a recent webinar, experts examined how artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally upending existing data protection laws and reshaping the debate over privacy protections.

In Bloomberg Law, CFJ's John Reeves argues that DOJ's RealPage suit mistakes algorithmic pricing for collusion and threatens AI innovation and antitrust law.

CFJ Executive Director Ashley Baker will be a panelist at Steptoe’s Sixth Annual Regulatory Symposium on May 14. Ashley will be part of the breakout session entitled “Antitrust and the First Amendment.”