State attempts to regulate artificial intelligence violate the Commerce Clause and risk crippling U.S. innovation. Congress must pass a federal moratorium to preempt state fragmentation and promote AI development.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the opinion represents a fundamental break from Supreme Court precedent.

The Committee for Justice applauds the committee for allocating $37 million below the 2025 FTC appropriations level.

In a recent webinar, experts examined how artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally upending existing data protection laws and reshaping the debate over privacy protections.

If a business uses ingenuity and business acumen to achieve such dominance, it has done nothing wrong—to the contrary, it has helped consumers through the competitive process. Business acumen can include a refusal to deal with rivals. The later is exactly what Google did with Play Store in the market for smartphone apps. Yet the district court has punished Google for these actions and forced it to open its Play Store to all of its rivals, without any conditions.

Discussions of the dangers of Artificial Intelligence (AI) have long included concerns about AI systems’ potential to discriminate against racial minorities, women, and other groups said to be disadvantaged. But more recently, there have been increasing concerns about the dangers of Woke AI. Because generative AI models learn from large amounts of real-world data, which is primarily gleaned from internet content and thus tends to reflect dominant cultural views...

Comments filed in response to the FTC's Proceeding “Trade Regulation Rule on Commercial Surveillance and Data Security.”

This event will feature two panel discussions with experts on key issues in antitrust law, followed by a reception for attendees.

Burden-shifting provisions that would require a company to prove it is not a monopoly would signify a return to the highly interventionist p