SCOTUS Hears Student Debt Case in which CFJ Filed Amicus Brief
The Committee for Justice filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers in today's student debt cases at the Supreme Court.
top of page
A legal and policy advocacy organization that educates the public and policymakers about the rule of law and constitutionally limited government.
Anchor 1
The Latest
Curt Levey
- Aug 19, 2022
In Warhol Copyright Case, CFJ Urges SCOTUS to Affirm Property Rights
The Committee for Justice filed a Supreme Court amicus brief in support of strong copyright protection for Lynn Goldsmith...
Ashley Baker
- Aug 17, 2022
CFJ Files Amicus Brief in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith
Copyright protections serve to vindicate the fundamental civil right that authors have to the fruits of their labors. This is how...
Ashley Baker
- May 17, 2022
CFJ Files Amicus Brief in Axon v. Federal Trade Commission
Not only can prompt and meaningful judicial review make or break a business, but timely judicial review is critical to enforce the...
Curt Levey
- Apr 18, 2022
CFJ Urges SCOTUS to Interpret Clean Water Act to Avoid Violating 5th Amendment
The Committee for Justice—along with the Atlantic Legal Foundation and Conservatives for Property Rights—have filed a Supreme Court...
Law 360
- Apr 15, 2022
Builders, Conservatives Urge High Court To Narrow CWA
Committee for Justice joins an amicus brief in the case of Sacket v. EPA.
Ashley Baker
- Nov 30, 2020
SCOTUS Should Reject Computer Statute Reading That Would Make Nearly Everyone Criminals
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Van Buren v. United States, which presents the Court with its first opportunity to interpret
Ashley Baker
- Feb 18, 2020
Amicus Brief Filed in Google v. Oracle in Support of Oracle
Copyright cases do not call for a free-ranging search for the best copyright policy, but rather depends solely on statutory interpretation.
Ashley N. Baker
- Sep 30, 2019
Defending Donor Privacy Against Compelled Disclosure: Amicus Brief Filed in AFP v. Becerra
NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny held that courts should apply narrow tailoring to violations of the
bottom of page