Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the lower court injunction violates longstanding antitrust precedent, will result in irreparable harm and is against the public interest.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the opinion represents a fundamental break from Supreme Court precedent.

The ruling represents an extreme departure from settled antitrust law. The injunction does not merely prohibit unlawful conduct—it compels Google to open the Play Store it built through years of investment to competitors for free, to distribute its entire app catalog to rival stores, and even to carry those rival stores within its own platform.

If a business uses ingenuity and business acumen to achieve such dominance, it has done nothing wrong—to the contrary, it has helped consumers through the competitive process. Business acumen can include a refusal to deal with rivals. The later is exactly what Google did with Play Store in the market for smartphone apps. Yet the district court has punished Google for these actions and forced it to open its Play Store to all of its rivals, without any conditions.

The Committee for Justice filed a Supreme Court amicus brief in the NetChoice cases challenging Texas and Florida social media laws.

CFJ's 5th Circuit amicus brief opposes the FTC’s attempt to block a merger between Illumina and Grail, maker of a breakthrough cancer test.

SCOTUS Unanimously Rebukes EPA on Clean Water Act; CFJ Filed Amicus Brief in the Case

Supreme Court rules that Andy Warhol’s silkscreen infringed copyright, as Committee for Justice’s amicus brief urged.

The Committee for Justice filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers in today's student debt cases at the Supreme Court.