In The National Law Review, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that Pennsylvania's GRID standards substitute state planning for market knowledge in AI data-center development.

In Truth on the Market, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that policymakers can't know enough about AI to regulate it well, so consumers, not bureaucrats, should steer it.

In The National Law Review, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that markets, not government mandates, should decide how to power the data centers behind American AI.

In the Washington Examiner, CFJ's Ashley Baker warns that Brazil's Europe-style digital rules punish American tech companies and open the door to China.

In Truth on the Market, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that non-binding AI term sheets invite firms to cluster around what Washington favors.

No government, federal or state, knows enough to regulate artificial intelligence. Why markets, not mandates, should govern AI.

These proposed reforms—particularly the restrictions on serial and parallel inter partes review (“IPR”) challenges and the requirement that petitioners stipulate to litigating validity in only one forum—represent an urgently needed course-correction to restore reliability to U.S. patent rights, strengthen American innovation, and fortify the nation’s technological leadership against foreign adversaries, especially the People’s Republic of China.

State attempts to regulate artificial intelligence violate the Commerce Clause and risk crippling U.S. innovation. Congress must pass a federal moratorium to preempt state fragmentation and promote AI development.

In Truth on the Market, CFJ's Jeffrey Depp argues that NIH's “access plan” mandate for patent licenses is central planning that threatens biomedical innovation.