Ashley Baker joins Dr. Vance Ginn on Let People Prosper to discuss Trump v. Slaughter, FTC power, antitrust enforcement and the cost of regulation.

CFJ’s Curt Levey sat down with Washington Times reporter Alex Swoyer on her Court Watch podcast to discuss pending Supreme Court decisions.

Last November, the Federal Trade Commission accepted comments on its proposal to start a rulemaking related to "Commercial Surveillance" - the agency's newly minted term for any and all business use of data about customers. The FTC has for decades sought to protect consumer privacy and data security through case-by-case application of its general consumer protection authority. It also is charged with rulemaking in a few narrow areas of privacy and data security. In practice,

Ashley Baker and Asheesh Agarwal discuss the FTC's Strategic Plan for 2022 - 2026 which sets out its priorities over the next five years.

View on YouTube Since Clarence Thomas’s nomination to the Supreme Court in 1991, his critics have periodically alleged that his wife Ginni Thomas’s work for conservative political causes creates a conflict of interest. Those attacks have intensified in the wake of news that Ginni Thomas encouraged the White House to challenge the 2020 presidential election results in a series of texts to Chief of Staff Mark Meadows shortly after the election. Our panel of Supreme Court expe

Burden-shifting provisions that would require a company to prove it is not a monopoly would signify a return to the highly interventionist p

Data portability has been a hot topic of late, from GDPR to CCPA to the FTC’s recent Data to Go Workshop. To some, data portability is a consumer right to access and move individual data. For others, data portability means the sharing of larger swaths of data with other services and platforms to lower entry barriers to effective competition. Although both forms of portability aim to enhance consumer welfare and increase competition, data portability raises a host of issues,

By a vote of 6-3 in yesterday's decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (combined with Altitude Inc. v. Zarda and R.G. & G.R. Harris F

Journalists and academics seem convinced that artificial intelligence is often biased against women and racial minorities. If Washington’s n