American technological leadership results from secure property rights driving risk taking not from centralized planning or regulatory micromanagement.

These proposed reforms—particularly the restrictions on serial and parallel inter partes review (“IPR”) challenges and the requirement that petitioners stipulate to litigating validity in only one forum—represent an urgently needed course-correction to restore reliability to U.S. patent rights, strengthen American innovation, and fortify the nation’s technological leadership against foreign adversaries, especially the People’s Republic of China.

Innovation is not a predictable linear process that begins in a lab and ends with a finished product ready for “access planning.”

A patent-value “fee” operates as a direct tax on personal property. Without apportionment, it squarely violates the Constitution.

Copyright protections serve to vindicate the fundamental civil right that authors have to the fruits of their labors. This is how...

Committee for Justice Director of Public Policy Ashley Baker participated in a panel hosted by ITIF...