Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the opinion represents a fundamental break from Supreme Court precedent.

The ruling represents an extreme departure from settled antitrust law. The injunction does not merely prohibit unlawful conduct—it compels Google to open the Play Store it built through years of investment to competitors for free, to distribute its entire app catalog to rival stores, and even to carry those rival stores within its own platform.

Media Contact: Curt Levey (202) 510-0128; clevey@committeeforjustice.org Committee for Justice president Curt Levey issued the following...

The following is a statement from Curt Levey, the Committee for Justice's president and one of the attorneys on the brief...

Copyright cases do not call for a free-ranging search for the best copyright policy, but rather depends solely on statutory interpretation.

NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny held that courts should apply narrow tailoring to violations of the

The Court should also grant review to revisit the concept of deference and the scope of deference granted to an executive agency. The power

The Committee for Justice was very busy in 2018. In the last year, we advocated for a clear framework for accessing data abroad, worked to d

Last year, the Committee for Justice joined Cause of Action Institute and Floor 64, Inc. in filing an amicus brief in support of the appella