In an amicus brief with the Manhattan Institute and Buckeye Institute, we urged the Supreme Court to hear Newman v. Moore.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the lower court injunction violates longstanding antitrust precedent, will result in irreparable harm and is against the public interest.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the opinion represents a fundamental break from Supreme Court precedent.

The ruling represents an extreme departure from settled antitrust law. The injunction does not merely prohibit unlawful conduct—it compels Google to open the Play Store it built through years of investment to competitors for free, to distribute its entire app catalog to rival stores, and even to carry those rival stores within its own platform.

The Committee for Justice, joined by Conservatives for Property Rights, filed an amicus brief in support of Supreme Court review of Centripetal Networks v. Cisco, a case in which the Federal Circuit wiped out the largest patent-damages award in U.S. history after a federal trial found that Cisco had engaged in “willful and egregious” infringement of Centripetal’s patents. The award was vacated on a technicality because the trial judge discovered, after completing his draft op

Insofar as the meaning of “the waters of the United States” is ambiguous, the Court should apply the canon of constitutional avoidance. The

The Committee for Justice, along with The Manhattan Institute and the Cato Institute, filed an amicus brief in support of the Kleins in Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry. The brief was authored by Ilya Shapiro, (counsel of record) of the Manhattan Institute, Trevor Burrus of the Cato Institute and CFJ President Curt Levey. The Kleins are a married couple who owned a bakery in Colorado, until they were fined $135,000 for refusing to violate their religious beliefs b

Not only can prompt and meaningful judicial review make or break a business, but timely judicial review is critical to enforce the...

Media Contact: Curt Levey (202) 510-0128; clevey@committeeforjustice.org Committee for Justice president Curt Levey issued the following statement: Washington, D.C. -- The Committee for Justice decided to get involved in this case because several of the issues at stake – including overcriminalization, fair notice, the rule of lenity, and the federal-state balance in criminal law – are at the heart of CFJ's mission of promoting the rule of law and preserving the Constitution's