Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the lower court injunction violates longstanding antitrust precedent, will result in irreparable harm and is against the public interest.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the opinion represents a fundamental break from Supreme Court precedent.

The ruling represents an extreme departure from settled antitrust law. The injunction does not merely prohibit unlawful conduct—it compels Google to open the Play Store it built through years of investment to competitors for free, to distribute its entire app catalog to rival stores, and even to carry those rival stores within its own platform.

Not only can prompt and meaningful judicial review make or break a business, but timely judicial review is critical to enforce the...

The Committee for Justice—along with the Atlantic Legal Foundation and Conservatives for Property Rights—have filed a Supreme Court...

Committee for Justice joins an amicus brief in the case of Sacket v. EPA.

Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Van Buren v. United States, which presents the Court with its first opportunity to interpret

Copyright cases do not call for a free-ranging search for the best copyright policy, but rather depends solely on statutory interpretation.

NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny held that courts should apply narrow tailoring to violations of the